A Small Group of Countries Are Actually ‘Carbon Negative’. Here’s How They’re Doing It.

As other countries make “net zero” pledges — these three nations are leading the way.

By Laurie Goering

GLASGOW, Nov 3 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) — The heavily forested Himalayan kingdom of Bhutan — which measures its success in “Gross National Happiness” — hasn’t made a net zero pledge, like a growing number of nations.

That’s because it is already “carbon negative”, absorbing more climate-changing emissions each year than it produces.

The forests of the thinly populated country of less than a million people absorb more than 9 million tonnes of carbon each year, while its economy, designed to reduce fossil fuel use and waste, produces less than 4 tonnes.

“We are showing the world what we can do if we have the political will,” Sonam Wangdi, secretary of the National Environment Commission, told the Thomson Reuters Foundation in an interview at the UN climate talks in Glasgow.

A tiny but growing club of “carbon negative” forest countries is emerging, with Suriname — a small rainforest country north of Brazil — already a member and Panama expected to be certified later this year.

What they have in common is strong protection of their carbon-absorbing forests alongside increasingly tough measures to hold down climate-changing emissions, including efforts to adopt renewable energy, electrify transport, and cut waste.

At COP26, they formed a formal alliance, signing a declaration calling for international finance, preferential trade, carbon pricing, and other measures to support their economies and other “carbon negative” nations yet to emerge.

Continued at GlobalCitizen.Org