And How a Major Political Party Can Become Complicit
Democratic systems rarely collapse all at once. Far more often, they erode slowly—through small compromises, repeated rationalizations, and the gradual normalization of behavior that once would have been unthinkable. Criminal conduct, unethical behavior, corruption, and government complicity do not usually arrive wearing a warning label. They are introduced incrementally, framed as exceptions, justified as necessities, or dismissed as partisan attacks. Over time, what was once scandalous becomes routine, and what was once disqualifying becomes tolerable.
Understanding how this normalization occurs is essential if democratic societies are to resist it. This essay examines the mechanisms by which corruption and criminality become embedded in governance, and how a political party—using the Republican Party as a case study—can gradually become complicit, even when many of its members may privately recognize the danger.
The Psychology of Normalization: From Shock to Shrug
Normalization begins with repetition. When unethical or illegal behavior is exposed, the first revelation often triggers outrage. But if similar behavior continues without meaningful consequences, public reaction dulls. What once provoked alarm becomes background noise.
Political actors learn quickly from this pattern. If a rule is broken and no penalty follows, the lesson is clear: the rule is optional. If an ethical breach is defended by party leaders, the breach becomes a loyalty test rather than a disqualifier. Over time, standards shift—not because people consciously agree corruption is acceptable, but because resisting it becomes exhausting, risky, or politically inconvenient.
This process is accelerated when leaders frame accountability as persecution. Investigations are described as “witch hunts.” Courts are painted as partisan. Journalists are cast as enemies. In this environment, evidence matters less than allegiance, and legality is judged not by law but by whether the accused is “on our side.”
Power, Fear, and Incentives Inside Political Parties
Political parties are not moral institutions; they are power-seeking organizations. Their internal incentives often reward conformity over conscience. Members who challenge unethical behavior within their own ranks risk primary challenges, loss of committee assignments, donor retaliation, or media attacks from aligned outlets.
Once a party perceives that holding its own leaders accountable could threaten electoral success, ethical reasoning is subordinated to strategic calculation. The question quietly shifts from “Is this wrong?” to “Will this hurt us politically if we admit it’s wrong?”
This dynamic helps explain how complicity spreads. A party does not need unanimous agreement to enable corruption. It only needs enough members willing to stay silent, deflect, or minimize wrongdoing. Silence becomes tacit approval; procedural excuses replace moral judgment.
Corruption as a Team Sport
In healthy democracies, corruption is individualized: specific actors are investigated and punished. In unhealthy ones, corruption becomes collectivized. Criticism of misconduct is reframed as an attack on the party itself, not on the behavior in question.
This “team sport” mentality is particularly dangerous. Once voters are encouraged to see accountability as betrayal, corruption gains a protective shield. Supporters may acknowledge wrongdoing privately but defend it publicly, convinced that admitting fault would empower the opposing side.
At that point, ethical standards are no longer shared civic values—they are partisan weapons, applied selectively and abandoned when inconvenient.
The Role of Media Ecosystems
Normalization cannot occur without an enabling information environment. When partisan media consistently downplay, reframe, or ignore unethical conduct, they provide psychological cover for both politicians and voters.
Rather than asking whether an act was legal or ethical, coverage focuses on motives: Who benefits from the accusation? Who is “really” behind the investigation? The facts become secondary to narratives about loyalty and grievance.
This is not simply bias; it is a structural distortion. When millions of citizens receive information from sources that treat corruption allegations as inherently illegitimate, democratic accountability breaks down. Voters cannot punish behavior they are trained not to see.
Government Institutions Under Pressure
Another hallmark of normalization is the gradual politicization of oversight institutions. Inspectors general, prosecutors, courts, and civil servants are attacked as disloyal when they enforce rules against powerful figures.
When a president or party leadership repeatedly undermines these institutions—questioning their legitimacy, threatening retaliation, or demanding personal loyalty—the message to subordinates is unmistakable: enforcing the law may cost you your career.
In such an environment, corruption does not require explicit orders. Anticipatory obedience does the work. Officials learn what outcomes are rewarded and adjust accordingly.
Current Context: Why the Warnings Are Getting Louder
In a recent widely discussed video interview, Chris Murphy warned that Americans are becoming dangerously accustomed to behavior from the executive branch that would once have triggered bipartisan alarm. His argument was not that corruption suddenly appeared, but that it is being steadily normalized—absorbed into daily political life with less resistance each time.
Murphy’s concern reflects a broader anxiety shared by many democracy scholars: that the greatest threat is no longer a single scandal, but the erosion of shared expectations about honesty, legality, and restraint. When norms collapse, laws alone cannot save democratic systems.
Importantly, this is not about individual personalities alone. It is about systems that reward loyalty over law and power over principle.
How a Party Becomes Complicit
A political party becomes complicit in corruption through a series of predictable steps:
- Denial – Initial allegations are dismissed outright, regardless of evidence.
- Deflection – Attention is redirected to alleged wrongdoing by opponents.
- Normalization – The behavior is framed as “how politics works.”
- Institutional Capture – Oversight mechanisms are weakened or politicized.
- Moral Inversion – Those seeking accountability are portrayed as the real threat.
At no point does complicity require unanimous agreement. It requires only enough compliance to block accountability and enough messaging discipline to prevent internal fracture.
Over time, the party’s identity becomes intertwined with defending the indefensible. At that point, reform feels existentially threatening, and corruption becomes self-sustaining.
Why This Matters Beyond Any One Party
Although this essay uses the Republican Party as a case study, the underlying mechanisms are not unique to any ideology. Any political movement that prioritizes power over principle is vulnerable to the same decay.
The real danger is not partisan victory or defeat; it is the loss of a shared moral framework that defines corruption as unacceptable regardless of who benefits. Democracies depend on losers’ consent, but they also depend on winners’ restraint.
When restraint disappears, democracy hollow-outs from within.
Reversing Normalization: What Actually Works
History shows that normalization can be reversed, but only through sustained pressure:
- Independent institutions must be protected, not politicized.
- Media literacy must be strengthened so citizens can recognize propaganda.
- Internal party dissent must be defended as patriotic, not treasonous.
- Voters must reward integrity even when it costs short-term victories.
Most importantly, corruption must be named clearly and consistently. Euphemism is its ally; clarity is its enemy.
Conclusion: The Cost of Looking Away
Criminal conduct and corruption do not become normal because citizens approve of them. They become normal because too many people conclude that resistance is futile, risky, or pointless. That quiet resignation is the true victory of corruption.
The question facing the United States today is not whether corruption exists—it always has—but whether it will be confronted as a systemic threat or absorbed as a permanent feature of political life. Parties that choose the latter path may win elections in the short term, but they do so at the expense of democratic legitimacy itself.
History is unambiguous on this point: when corruption becomes normal, decline soon follows. The only uncertainty is how much damage is done before the public decides that “normal” has gone too far.
This blog post was inspired by this video:
empowerment & inner transformation... 
Leave a comment